Taylor v. State Highway Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
The chronology of events in the record of this case raises the question, not whether the action should have been dismissed when it was, but why it was not dismissed earlier for the evident failure to diligently seek its trial and disposition.
The circuit court rested its dismissal of this action on three foundations: (1) Sec. 269.25, Stats.; (2) sec. 270.54; 2 and (3) the inherent authority of the court. 3 Any one would do. The circuit court judge clearly had the authority to dismiss this action on his own motion. It long has been the legislative, judicial and public policy in this state that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Latham v. Casey & King Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Smith v. CarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Neuhaus v. Clark CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Fleming v. EllisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Wisconsin Lumber & Supply Co. v. DahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Johnson v. Allis Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Marshall-Wisconsin Co. v. Juneau Square Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Trispel v. HaeferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Prahl v. BrosamleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Hudson Diesel, Inc. v. KenallCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.