Reynolds v. State

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

The offense is possession of marihuana; the punishment, twelve years.

Appellant’s first ground of error complains of the prosecutor’s jury argument.

During defense argument, appellant’s counsel said:

“As you can see, he is afraid now. He was shaking on that stand. So, he is capable of fear, and I will get back to that in a little bit.”

In reply the prosecutor said:

“Think about his demeanor in Court up to now, because now it’s a little different. Think about yesterday. What was his attitude yesterday? You know, he has been here, this is his third time. He is a three time loser…