Jordan v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TEAGUE, Judge.
Darrell Wayne Jordan and Diane Jordan, appellants, were separately indicted for the felony offense of possession of marihuana. They were jointly tried before a jury. The jury found each guilty and assessed punishment at three years’ confinement in the penitentiary but recommended in the instance of Diane that her punishment be probated.
We have found reversible error in the jury argument of one of the prosecuting attorneys. Appellants do not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. We will, therefore, not discuss the facts of the case. The other grounds of error that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Berryhill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Gaddis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Borjan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Kunkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Dickinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.