Hernandez v. State

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for the offense of unlawful possession of a narcotic drug, to-wit: heroin. Punishment was assessed at life. 1

Initially, appellant complains of “extraneous criminal acts introduced against him.”

By this ground of error the appellant complains of the introduction of quantities of heroin and various pieces of narcotics paraphernalia that were recovered by the officers at the time and place of the arrest and search. More specifically, he contends that such evidence was inadmissible as it tended to show extraneous offenses.

The record reflects that…