United States v. Ramon Rodriguez and Michael Buttigieg
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
This is one of a growing number of cases in which evidence of crime has been discovered in the course of a search of baggage or parcels consigned to commercial carriers for shipment. 1 The issue is whether the Dis trict Court erred by denying defendants’ motion to suppress narcotics which were discovered when employees of Emery Air Freight Co. opened a parcel delivered to Emery by defendant Rodriguez for shipment to defendant Buttigieg. Both defendants were convicted of conspiracy to possess narcotics with intent to distribute, 2 and Buttigieg was also convicted of the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Ronald James ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. John Allen AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Richard John BarryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. James MathisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- State v. EisemanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.