Legal Opinion

United States v. James Mathis

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 23, 2013No. 18-1124PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLE, Circuit Judge.

After a three-week jury trial, James Mathis and Donald Fillers were convicted of conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 371, and violations of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7413(c). Fillers was also convicted of making a false statement, 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2), and obstruction of justice, 18 U.S.C. § 1519. The district court denied Fillers’s motion to suppress and Mathis’s and Fillers’s motions for a judgment of acquittal. It sentenced Mathis to 18 months’ imprisonment and Fillers to 44 months’ imprisonment. Mathis and Fillers raise several challenges to their convictions and…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Rosaire DubruleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Ruth RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Christopher EatonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. Samuel Mullet, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  5. Olvera v. City of ModestoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API