United States v. Richard John Barry
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Chief Judge.
Barry was convicted by a jury of possessing a schedule II controlled substance (Methaqualone) with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).
The District Court denied Barry’s motion to suppress evidence allegedly seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The evidence, four bottles containing the controlled substance, was introduced at trial and formed the basis for his conviction. Barry now argues it was error: 1) to deny the suppression motion; and 2) to admit telephone records offered as evidence to show the requisite intent under the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lorraine I. Bills v. Dennis W. AseltineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. David Leigh KingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Debbie L. And Gary GivensCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Ghaster v. City of Rocky RiverDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.