Legal Opinion

Tornquist v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1932No. Docket No. 911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARDEN, J., pro tem.

Suit on foreign judgment for money.

On October 20, 1923, O. W. Richardson & Company, a corporation, procured a judgment against defendants Halleck F. Johnson and Ralph E. Johnson, in the Marshall County Circuit Court, comprising the forty-first judicial circuit (since changed to the seventy-second judicial circuit) of the state of Indiana, in the sum of $579.39, together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum until paid. Plaintiff filed this action as assignee of said O. W. Richardson & Company, a corporation, against said defendants on said judgment…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux Inc. v. SecaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Harris v. BarnhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Harper v. RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Young v. RosenbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  5. People v. KnutteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Day v. WiswallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  2. Schaefer v. LackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API