Legal Opinion

Harris v. Barnhart

California Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1893No. 18086PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

Plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, brought this action to recover three thousand six hundred dollars. According to the allegations of the com-, plaint, the plaintiffs, on the fifteenth day of December, 1884, were indebted to defendant in the sum of about $4,374, a balance due upon a promissory note of $8,000 made by them t'o the latter; that on said date, and as security for the payment.of such balance, they executed, acknowledged, and delivered to defendant an absolute deed of certain premises, consisting of ten acres of land, with the improvements thereon, known as the Stockton…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murray v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Woodbury v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Thornton v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. McGarrahan v. MaxwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Estate of RicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Cashin v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  4. People v. Bank of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Feeney v. HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API