Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. Lack

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1946No. Civ. No. 15205PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KINCAID, J. pro tem.

John L. Schaefer and Henry S. Dottenheim, each an attorney at law, duly licensed to practice as such in California, brought the within action to recover attorneys’ fees from defendant, as their client, for services performed in connection with an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court, for the southern district of California, to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

The cause was tried before a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment in behalf of plaintiffs in the sum of $24,145.77, from which defendant now appeals. Subsequent to the entry of judgment,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Wilson v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Johnston v. LanducciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Elconin v. YalenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Cusick v. BoyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schwartz v. SchwerinArizona Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API