Legal Opinion
Silverstein v. CAMPOSEO
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 6, 2010No. AC 30371PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, Morris Silverstein, appearing pro se, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant, the Honorable Elaine N. Campo-seo, judge of the Probate Court for the district of Ando-ver, to allow him to bring an appeal. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) denied his petition and (2) denied his request to present evidence during a reargument hearing. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following relevant facts, as found by the trial court, and procedural history. On…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Fuller v. MarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Labow v. LabowConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- VanBuskirk v. KnierimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Cammarota v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Singh v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Connery v. GieskeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Silverstein v. CAMPOSEOSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Silverstein v. CamposeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010