Legal Opinion

McFarland v. Pierce

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1897No. 17,938PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

The appellees sued the appellants Abraham W. McFarland, The Ridgeville Milling Company, a corporation, and two others, seeking an accounting by said McFarland and others, as the officers and managers of said company, and the appointment, without notice, of a receiver, pending the litigation, to take the custody of the property, books,. and effects of said Milling Company.

The circuit court, on April 20, 1896, appointed a receiver as prayed, and on the 21st day of April, as shown by the bill of exceptions, but on the 22nd day of April, as shown by the order book entry, said McFarland and said…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Geer v. Common Council of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Armstrong v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Dickerson's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
  4. Woodward v. SpearSupreme Court of Vermont · 1838
  5. Colden v. BottsNew York Supreme Court · 1834

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. Indiana State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Huffman v. Indiana Office of Environmental AdjudicationIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Scott v. Anderson Newspapers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. City of Hammond v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Tillinghast v. Brown UniversitySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1902

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API