Legal Opinion

Howle v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 17, 1935No. 6 Div. 600PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, Justice

(after stating the facts)..

The renewal of the application for temporary injunction was not authorized by section 8295 of the Code 1923, after it had been denied by the circuit court on hearing of the parties, and the order and fiat of the Presiding Judge of the Court of Appeals and the injunction issued in pursuance thereof were and' are void. Zimmern v. Southern Ry., 206 Ala. 69, 89 So. 171; Lee et al. v. City of Birmingham, 221 Ala. 419, 128 So. 902.

Therefore the above-mentioned order did not supersede and vacate the order of the circuit court denying the application, and that order is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Crumpton v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. State ex rel. Knox v. DillardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. State Ex Rel. Daniel v. KizerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  4. Lee v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Lee v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. One Pinball Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  2. State Ex Rel. Dussault v. KilburnMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Alabama Power Co. v. City of ScottsboroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. State Ex Rel. Green v. One 5¢ Fifth Inning Base Ball MacHineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Hurvich v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API