Legal Opinion

Lee v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1931No. 6 Div. 866PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The bill in equity was filed by the city of Birmingham to condemn as contraband certain slot machines alleged to be gambling devices seized by the police department of the city under authority of its ordinances, and for the recovery of which the respondents bad begun separate actions at law. The bill alleges that they were kept or operated in violation of Ordinance No. 1104-C of the city of Birmingham. The particular description of the machines is somewhat conthsed, and does not correspond in sonic detail with that set out in the ordinance, but they are alleged to be machines operated as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. J. B. Mullen & Co. v. MoseleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Truss v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Turner v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  4. Roanoke Guano Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Southern Steel Co. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. O'Dell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  2. Birmingham Bar Ass'n v. Phillips & MarshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Try-Me Bottling Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Callahan v. Auburn Production Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Howle v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API