State Ex Rel. Daniel v. Kizer
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice BeeasE.
This action, brought in the original jurisdiction of this Court, seeks an injunction to prevent the defendants, either directly or indirectly, from operating, or attempting to operate, or to have others to operate, unlawful slot machines in this State, and also to enjoin them from interfering with the law enforcement officers in .enforcing the statutes of the State relative to unlawful slot machines.
The complaint of the plaintiff, which is of considerable length, briefly summarized, alleges that the defendants and others have…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- J. B. Mullen & Co. v. MoseleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
- Harvie v. Heise, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Seignious v. LimehouseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Elder v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Ezell v. RitholzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- State v. 192 Coin-Operated Video Game MacHinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- State v. CoubalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Mims Amusement Co. v. South Carolina Law Enforcement DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.