Legal Opinion

Hurvich v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 20, 1935No. 6 Div. 652PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is a suit in equity to declare a slot machine contraband and to be destroyed pursuant to the power contained in the act approved July 25, 1931 (Gen. Acts 1931, p. 806). It is not controverted that the machine, called a Roscoe, is a gambling device within the terms of that act.

Appellant contends that it is not subject to condemnation and destruction because it is not shown ever to have been used for gambling, and that he himself was a dealer in such machines, and not an operator, and had no purpose or intent ever to operate it.

Section 3 of the act (page 807) makes it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Bobel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Blackwell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Howle v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. House & Lot v. State Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Eccles v. StoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Chapman v. AggelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Kendrick v. State Ex Rel. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. People v. KayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. State v. AppleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API