Legal Opinion

Freeman v. State Board of Medical Examiners

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1915No. 5854PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from District Court, Bryan County; ■Jesse M. Hatchett, Judge. Certiorari by R. W. Freeman against the State Board of Medical Examiners. Writ quashed, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUMMONS, C.

The questions involved in this appeal raised in the brief of plaintiff in error necessary to be considered consist of four propositions: First. Is the state a necessary party to this proceeding? Second. Is the clause in section 6905, Rev. Laws 1910, defining “unprofessional” conduct of a physician as fol-lows: “Second. The obtaining of any fee on the assurance that an incurable disease can be permanently cured” —void and of no effect? Third. Whether or not the proceedings before the State Board of Medical Examiners and the district court were regular and free from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Meffert v. State Board of Medical Registration & ExaminationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. State ex rel. Chapman v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. State v. EstesOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Munk v. FrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  5. State Medical Board of Arkansas Medical Society v. McCrarySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Wirz v. WirzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Dyment v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Board of Medical Examiners v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State Board of Medical Examiners v. JordanWashington Supreme Court · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API