Legal Opinion
Dyment v. Board of Medical Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 5, 1922No. Civ. No. 3677PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
On December 21, 1917, respondent Board of Medical Examiners of the State of California issued to petitioner a certificate authorizing him to practice medicine and surgery. The document was of the kind known as a reciprocity certificate, that term being applied to a certificate issued without examination, under section 13 of the Medical Practice Act (Stats. 1913, p. 722, as amended Stats. 1917, p. 107), upon the production by an applicant for leave to practice medicine and surgery in California of a license certificate issued by the medical board of a sister state. Section 14 of the same act…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Suckow v. AldersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Richardson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Lanterman v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Freeman v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Munk v. FrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Higgins v. License Commissioners of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Abrams v. DaughertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Dyment v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Gajanich v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.