Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Chapman v. State Board of Medical Examiners
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 24, 1885PublishedCited by 42 opinions
Writ of prohibition.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The relator, being a graduate in medicine, and having received from the University of Pennsylvania a diploma and the degree of M. D., on the 26th of January, 1884, presented his diploma to the State Board of Medical Examiners, which issued to him its certificate to that effect, pursuant to the provisions of Laws 1883, c. 125, entitled “An act to regulate the practice of medicine in the state of Minnesota.” In June, 1885, complaint having been made to the board that relator had, since the issue of such certificate, been guilty of dishonorable and unprofessional conduct, it caused a copy of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Ex Parte SecombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Somerville's Executors v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Meffert v. State Board of Medical Registration & ExaminationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- State ex rel. Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Lawrence v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- People v. PhippinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.