Legal Opinion

Wirz v. Wirz

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1950No. Civ. 14196PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued for divorce charging his wife with “incurable insanity” under the provisions of section 108 of the Civil Code. The trial court denied the decree. The principal question involved on the appeal is the quantum of proof required to establish “incurable insanity.”

The code section reads in part: “A divorce may be granted on the grounds of incurable insanity only upon proof that the insane spouse has been confined to an institution . . . for a period of at least three continuous years immediately preceding the filing of the action and upon the testimony of a member of the medical…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. In Re Estate of PepperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Freese v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dribin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Spolter v. Four-Wheel Brake Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Sanders v. MacFarlane's CandiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Klinker v. KlinkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Krause v. ApodacaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API