Legal Opinion
United States v. Messino
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 3, 1995No. 93 CR 294PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court are two pretrial motions to suppress evidence. The court has previously described the indictment in this case. See United States v. Messino, 852 F.Supp. 652, 653-54 (N.D.Ill.1994); see also, 865 F.Supp. 511 (N.D.Ill.1994); 855 F.Supp. 973 (N.D.Ill.1994); 855 F.Supp. 955 (N.D.Ill. 1994); 852 F.Supp. 657 (N.D.Ill.1994); 842 F.Supp. 1107 (N.D.Ill.1994). The court therefore will proceed directly to disposition of the motions. 1
I. DEFENDANT CHRISTOPHER RICHARD MESSINO’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS
Defendant Christopher Richard Messino has…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. LisbonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011
- United States v. MessinoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- United States v. MessinoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- State v. BauderSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.