Legal Opinion

United States v. Messino

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 12, 1995No. 93 CR 294PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ALE SI A, District Judge.

Before the court is the pending portion of defendant Clement A. Messino’s Motion to Exclude Evidence Seized During Execution of Warrants of Seizure and Monition Pursuant to Civil Forfeiture Proceedings.1

I. INTRODUCTION

The court first commented on this motion in its Memorandum Opinion and Order dated December 19, 1994, 1994 WL 722742, at *1-3. In that opinion the court denied the motion insofar as it sought to exclude certain evidence based on an alleged violation of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and to exclude certain…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. David Bentley, Richard Degen, Allen Yung, and Walter JostenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. MessinoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. ChandlerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API