Legal Opinion

Cook v. Los Angeles Ry. Corporation

California Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1915No. L.A. No. 3431PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff as the result of a collision between an automobile driven by him and an electric street-car of the defendant. There was a jury trial and a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant.

The testimony on the issues of defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence was sharply conflicting, and no question is made of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. While it was shown without contradiction that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Isaac & Rebecca Thomas v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. George v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Cooper v. Los Angeles Terminal RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Wilhelm v. DoneganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Webb v. Francis J. Lewald Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hurd v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Coorough v. DeLayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Soukup v. SummerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API