Wilhelm v. Donegan
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Waldo M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, C.
Action for injuries to personal property. In his complaint the plaintiff alleges that on a certain day the defendant “seized plaintiff’s buggy while plaintiff’s team of horses was attached thereto, and while plaintiff was seated therein, and overturned and upset said buggy, throwing plaintiff violently to the ground and causing” injury to his horses, buggy, and harness. To this complaint, which was unverified, the defendant made a general denial. The cause was tried before a jury, and a verdict rendered in favor of the defendant. From the judgment entered thereon and from an order…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Cook v. Los Angeles Ry. CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- People's Ice & Fuel Co. v. SeratSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Hurd v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Coorough v. DeLayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Salyer v. Central National BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.