George v. Los Angeles Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
—Action for personal injuries. The jury-found a general verdict for defendant. Against plaintiff's objection, the court submitted certain questions to the jury,, the answers to which were favorable to defendant.
The appeal is from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for new trial. The evidence disclosed the following facts:
The defendant was, at the time of the accident, engaged in operating a street railway on Pasadena avenue, in East Los Angeles; for two days preceding the accident the defendant had left seven or eight small ears, commonly known as "trailers,” at the end of said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Bransom's adm'r v. LabrotCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884
- Barrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Smith v. Occidental & Oriental Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Studer v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone & Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Boyle v. Coast Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Reardon v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Marston v. Pickwick Stages, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.