Legal Opinion
People v. McDonnell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In this proceeding under the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C), the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (hereinafter the Board) prepared a risk assessment instrument (hereinafter the RAI) assessing points under various risk factors for a toted score within risk level two. The Board’s point assessment was supported by clear and convincing evidence of the applicable risk factors, thus rendering a presumptive risk level two designation (see Correction Law § 168-d [3]; People v Pettigrew, 14 NY3d 406, 408-409 [2010]). The defendant was properly designated a “predicate sex…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. PettigrewNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. HinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. AgardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. DeDonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. SuberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. DeDonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012