People v. Hill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chambers, J), dated December 21, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated her a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The People met their burden of proving by clear and convine*991ing evidence the facts that supported the defendant’s adjudication as a level three sex offender (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Morales, 33 AD3d 982 [2006]; People v Dong V. Dao, 9 AD3d 401 [2004]). Although the Supreme Court failed to set…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. GuamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. InghilleriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. DexterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. BurgosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. HegazyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. MantillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. BriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.