Legal Opinion

People v. Suber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 2012PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Correction Law § 168-n (3) requires a court making a risk level determination pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA; see Correction Law art 6-C) to “render an order setting forth its determinations and the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which the determinations are based.” Here, the Supreme Court failed to adequately set forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law in its order. However, since the record is sufficient for this Court to make its own findings of fact and conclusions of law, remittal is not required (see People v Lashway, 66 AD3d 662,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. GuitardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. People v. JoslynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. McDonnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. MaldonadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. BelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  5. People v. AuletaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API