Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Brissenden

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 15, 1930PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an application for an order to require the defendant to answer questions propounded to him in the course of a hearing before the Attorney General conducted under chapters 4 and 13 of the Resolves of 1930. By said c. 4 the General Court directed the Attorney General “to make a thorough investigation of the circumstances surrounding the pension awarded to Oliver B. Garrett as a member of the police department of the city of Boston, and all other related matters dealing with the service of the said Oliver B. Garrett during his term of employment as a member of said police department. For…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Kilbourn v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. O'Coin's, Inc. v. Treasurer of the County of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. School Committee of Springfield v. Board of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Annenberg v. RobertsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Parker v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API