Legal Opinion

City of Kansas City v. Piercy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 2002No. WD 60564PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

The appellant, Timothy Piercy, was found guilty in municipal court of knowingly operating a motor vehicle while his privilege to do so had been suspended under Kansas City Municipal Ordinance § 70.131, and in a trial de novo in Circuit Court. This appeal is taken from his de novo trial in Circuit Court. He was sentenced to ninety days confinement. In his pro se brief, the appellant apparently argues that the trial court erred in: 1) denying his motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction, 2) in not taking notice of a document…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ConawayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Russell v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scrivener Oil Co., Inc. v. CriderMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. City of Plattsburg v. DavisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Olds v. Missouri Board of Probation & ParoleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API