Legal Opinion
Russell v. Division of Employment Security
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 10, 2001No. 23877PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Judge.
Michelle Russell (“Claimant”) appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her claim for unemployment benefits. The Division of Employment Security (“Respondent”) contends that Claimant’s appeal should be dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 84.04.1 We agree.
Claimant appears pro se. Nevertheless, she is held to the same standard with respect to the proceeding as a party represented by a licensed attorney. Carroll v. AAA Bail Bonds, 6 S.W.3d 215, 217 (Mo.App.S.D.1999). As explained in Sutton v. Goldenberg, 862 S.W.2d 515,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coyne v. CoyneMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Sutton v. GoldenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Carroll v. AAA Bail BondsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Brown v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Libberton v. PhillipsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- City of Kansas City v. PiercyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Blankenship v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Call v. Branson Enterprises, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Dale R. Ludwig v. Missouri Soybean Merchandising Council, Missouri Soybean Association, and Foundation for Soy InnovationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.