Legal Opinion
State v. Anderson
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 9, 2001No. ED 77825PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DRAPER, Judge.
Blake E. Anderson (hereinafter, “Anderson”) and Deborah S. Anderson appeal from the trial court’s judgment denying Anderson’s motion for the return of seized property following a hearing. We dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with Rule 81.12 and Rule 84.04.
Anderson appears in this appeal pro se. He raises thirty-one points relied on seeking the return of various items seized during the search of the home of Deborah S. Anderson. Pro se appellants and attorneys are held to the same procedural rules; pro se appellants do not receive preferential treatment regarding compliance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Shochet v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Coyne v. CoyneMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Faith Baptist Church of Berkeley, Inc. v. HeffnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Snelling v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martin v. MorganMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. WahlMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- White v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- City of Kansas City v. PiercyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Miller v. WangsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.