Legal Opinion

Zitterkopf v. Bradbury

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1989No. 89-126PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Chief Justice.

Appellant Gary Zitterkopf, doing business as Superior Woods Construction, sued to recover $13,964.70 upon quantum meruit for remodeling the home of appellee Basil Bradbury. After a bench trial, the district court found that the $40,000 Bradbury had paid sufficiently compensated Zitterkopf for the work done. Zitterkopf frames the issues as follows:

“1. The District Court erred, and abused its discretion in failing to award compensation to the plaintiff on the basis of quantum meruit for the materials and services rendered to the Defendant from November 6, 1987 to December…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bereman v. BeremanWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Pancratz Co. v. Kloefkorn-Ballard Construction/Development, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Johnson v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Merritt v. McIntyre and McIntyre Garden Center and Greenhouse CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Snearly v. HockettWyoming Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. EM Nominee Partnership Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Adkins v. LawsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Bowles v. Sunrise Home Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Shaw v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. BHP Petroleum Co., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API