Legal Opinion

Pancratz Co. v. Kloefkorn-Ballard Construction/Development, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1986No. 86-20PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

Appellant Pancratz Company, Inc., brought suit against appellee Kloefkorn-Ballard Construction/Development, Inc., to collect money appellant claimed appellee owed for construction work performed by appellant. Appellant’s complaint was based on breach of an oral contract, and was later amended to include recovery based on quantum meruit and unjust enrichment. The only theory appellant pursues on appeal is quantum meruit.

The trial court found generally that appellant failed to prove its claims and that appellant was “ * * * entitled to judgment only in the admitted amount of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Bereman v. BeremanWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Swiftships, Inc. v. BurdinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Nardi & Co., Inc. v. AllabastroAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Montes v. Naismith and Trevino Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. O'S Gold Seed Co. v. United Agri-Products Financial Services, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. City of Laramie v. HysongWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Weisbrod v. ElyWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bowles v. Sunrise Home Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Schaub v. WilsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API