Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Smith

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1998No. 97-236PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Appellant, Laurie J. Shaw (Shaw), accepted employment with a California corporation, Smith, Gosnell, Nicholson & Associates (SGN), at the request of its president and major shareholder, Crayton Smith (Smith). Several years later, Shaw began a live-in relationship with Smith that lasted for over nine years. When Shaw was removed from Smith’s household and later terminated from her job, she filed claims against Smith for breach of express and implied contract and unjust enrichment, and a claim against SGN for wrongful termination. The district court dismissed SGN, ruling the…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Venetian Salami Co. v. ParthenaisSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Claman v. PoppWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Birt v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Worley v. Wyoming Bottling Co., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Double Eagle Petroleum & Mining Corporation v. Questar Exploration & Production CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re Estate of MaycockWyoming Supreme Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API