Legal Opinion

Cooper v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Washington District Court. The opinion states the nature of the action, and the material facts. At the June term, 1886, the court sustained defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence. This ruling plaintiff Cooper brings here for review.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Holt, C.:

In 1884, J. A. Cooper opened a grocery store in Washington, Kansas, with a capital of $800, money which he had borrowed from his wife, the plaintiff in this action. None of that money came to her from her husband; she got $769 of it from her mother, and the other $31 *6was her own. After he had been in business for a time, he took into partnership with him L. K. Knapp, and they continued the business under the name of Cooper & Knapp. Knapp did not put any money into the business, but gave his services; he was to share in the profits; and if after continuing the business for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bailey v. Kansas Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Saylors v. State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Kelly v. Central Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. First National Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. First National Bank v. Ridenour, Baker & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  5. Fowler v. ShawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API