First National Bank v. Ridenour, Baker & Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Barber District Court. The opinion, filed March 7,1891, contains a sufficient statement of the material facts, pleadings and proceedings in the ease.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Strang, C.:
Action by the plaintiff to foreclose a chattel mortgage, begun in the district court of Barber county, Kansas, October 2,1886. August 30, 1886, the firm of Lovejoy & Glasscock, being indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $10,000 and accrued interest, executed a chattel mortgage to C. J. Lovejoy to secure said indebtedness, which mortgage was filed in the office of the register of deeds of Barber county September 1, 1886, at half-past 7 o’clock A. M. On the same day Lovejoy & Glasscock executed a chattel mortgage to C. J. Lovejoy, to secure an alleged indebtedness of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Russell v. Clark's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Curtis v. TylerNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
- Ohio Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. LedyardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
- Cullum v. Branch BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Paris v. HulettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wogan v. SiveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Hasie v. ConnorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Silver Lake State Bank v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Phelps & Bigelow Windmill Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Davis v. CaldwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.