First National Bank v. Wilson

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

The First National Bank of Eureka brought this action against Nannie Wilson and Mamie E. Wilson upon a promissory note given in renewal of a note dated December 17, 1910. The defendants filed a cross-peti-. tion setting up a counterclaim to the bank’s demand. The jury’s verdict, was in favor of the defendants, who recovered judgment for costs. The plaintiff appeals.

*73The facts upon which the defendants’ counterclaim was based were substantially as follows: About September, 1910, the defendant, Nannie Wilson, entered into an oral agreement…