Legal Opinion

Julius Hyman & Co. v. Velsicol Corp.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 6, 1948No. 16,084PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

This inquiry stands submitted on defendant in error’s motion to dismiss writ of error.

For the purposes of the motion, and only to that do we address ourselves, it is sufficient to state that defendant in error sued to enjoin plaintiffs in error “from making and selling insecticides made by using in any form or manner,” certain letters patent and applications for patents, etc., alleged to be the property of defendant in error, and for an accounting in relation to the use thereof and sales already made by plaintiffs in error. On trial, injunction was adjudged, an accounting was ordered, and in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dusing v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  2. Boxwell v. Greeley Union National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  3. Smith v. BungeIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Heck v. Heck Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1943

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morron v. McDanielSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  2. Alexander v. City of Colorado SpringsColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. M Life Insurance Co. v. Sapers & Wallack Insurance Agency, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Joel L. Schaffer v. CM SULLIVAN, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Levi v. SextonAlaska Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API