Legal Opinion

Levi v. Sexton

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1968No. 848PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

In the trial court appellee John Sexton instituted an action for the dissolution of a partnership he had entered into with appellant Lloyd Levi. 1 In his complaint appellee requested that the court appoint a receiver to manage the partnership’s bar and hotel business; that an accounting be undertaken; that the partnership’s assets be liquidated to satisfy liabilities; and that the partnership be dissolved. 2 Appellant Levi filed an answer containing two counterclaims and also requested essentially the same relief appellee liad in' regard to the partnership. 3

On March S,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bakewell v. BakewellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. David v. GoodmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Williams v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. In Re Mountain View Public Utility District No. 1Alaska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. HillstrandAlaska Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BrowderAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hanby v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Etheredge v. BradleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Dimmick v. WattsAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. BrowderAlaska Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API