Legal Opinion
Heck v. Heck Bros.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 9, 1943No. Civ. 3095PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Plaintiff and respondent Rose Heck, and defendant and appellant O. C. Heck, were married on March 27, 1925. They separated on March 13, 1941. Subsequently, Rose Heck filed this action against her husband, O. C. Heck, and E. P. Heck, his brother, who were conducting a farming business as a copartnership under the firm name of Heck Bros. She alleges generally in her complaint that on November 18, 1920, prior to her marriage, O. C. Heck advanced $33,656.59 to the partnership, and that the partnership agreed to repay said sum to O. C. Heck during the course of administration of the partnership or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Gunder v. GunderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Learned v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lacey v. BertoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Kinoshita v. HorioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Julius Hyman & Co. v. Velsicol Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1948
- Shirley v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Swarthout v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.