Alexander v. City of Colorado Springs
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Judge.
Defendant, City of Colorado Springs (City), appeals partial summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs, discharged city employees. We dismiss this appeal as premature.
The City of Colorado Springs adopted a charter amendment entitled “Removal of Striking Employees.” A subsection of this amendment requires that each city employee be furnished a copy of the amendment and be apprised of its provisions. Plaintiffs were absent from employment when the City implemented discharge proceedings without complying with this notice provision.
At the beginning of discharge hearings,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harding Glass Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- D. H. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Stillings v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Moore v. Triangle Construction & Development Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Corporon v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Salazar v. General Steel Domestic Sales, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Turchick & Kempter v. HURD & TITAN CONST.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. LinneburColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Virdanco, Inc. v. MTS InternationalColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.