Legal Opinion

Pocahontas Fuel Co. v. Dillion

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 21, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.

The object of this suit, instituted by the heirs of William. A. Dillion, who in 1905 died intestate, is to have certain deeds and a lease declared void and of no effect in so far as they affect the title of complainants to an undivided one-half interest in two certain tracts of land.

Complainants allege and prove that on the 27th day of *305February, 1869, George F. Crockett and wife conveyed to Harvey Walker and William A. Dillion “a certain tract or piece of land, being his interest in the lands of John Crockett, deceased, which land lies on the waters of Laurel creek in Abbs Valley in Tazewell…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Parkersburg Industrial Co. v. SchultzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Dodge v. Freedman's Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Virginia Coal & Iron Co. v. HyltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
  4. Hill v. . BeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Clary v. . HattonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spicer v. SpicerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  2. Smith v. Pittston CompanySupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  3. Bulifant v. SlosjarikSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API