Legal Opinion

Parkersburg Industrial Co. v. Schultz

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1897PublishedCited by 62 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Wood county. Ejectment by the Parkersburg Industrial Company against Otto Schultz and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

BraNNON, Judge:

This is an action of ejectment brought by the Parkers-burg Industrial Company against Otto Schultz and others to recover six coterminous town lots, numbered from seven t.o twelve, inclusive, containing one hundred and twenty-six poles in the aggregate, lying near the mouth of the Little Kanawha river, on the south side of it from Park-ersburg'. The plaintiff traced title from the State of Virginia under two patents, — one to James Neal, dated September 14, 1785, for four hundred acres, and one to John Stokely, for one thousand two hundred acres, dated May 9, .1804. In the line…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reusens v. LawsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. McMechen v. McMechenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Core v. FaupelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Creekmur v. CreekmurSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
  5. Snider v. CroyNew York Supreme Court · 1807

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Wheeling Electrical Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State v. CliffordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. State v. TaylorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Ralston v. Town of WestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Cecil v. ClarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API