Legal Opinion

Hill v. . Bean

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1909PublishedCited by 20 opinions

ActioN tried before Long, J., and a jury, at December Term, 1908, of Randolph. Defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This action was brought to recover two contiguous tracts of land, containing about one hundred and sixty-eight acres. Title was admitted to be out of the State, and the plaintiffs own the land, unless the defendants have acquired title,..thereto by adverse possession. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants’ possession was not adverse, but they held the same by permission' of the plaintiffs. In order to show that the defendants were merely tenants of the plaintiffs, the latter introduced as a witness Scott-Smoke, who testified as to a conversation between him and Emily Bean, one of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. GaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Yates v. . YatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  3. Ratliff v. Ratliff.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. . SteeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Parrish v. Boysell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. State v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Williams v. . Stores Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API