Legal Opinion

In Re Monsell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 14, 1930No. 20295PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E.M. Monsell and George Magnien protested certain tax levies made by the excise board of Tulsa county for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1928, as illegal and excessive. An appeal was taken by protestants from the judgment of the Court of Tax Review.

Protestants present two proposition, which we will consider in the inverse order of their presentation.

The second proposition is:

"The taxing officials, without any authority of law, arbitrarily added 10 per cent. of the amounts to be received from 1/4 mill state levy, gross production tax, gasoline excise tax and automobile license tax, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Threadgill v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Ryan v. Roach Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Albrecht v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Hines v. DaltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Board of Ed. v. MorleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Protest of ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. St. Louis-S. F. R. v. Choctaw County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Protest of St Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Protest of TrimbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API