Legal Opinion
Protest of Trimble
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 16, 1931No. 21565PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The protestants filed their protest of taxes under the provisions of Initiative .Petition No. 100. After hearings by the Court of Tax Review, the protests were denied in part and sustained in part. From the judgment of that court, the protestants appealed as to certain items and the protestee appealed as to certain items. The tax involved is for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1929.
The protestants appealed from the judgment of the Court of Tax Review sustaining their protest of 4 mills for the Tulsa city general fund levy in part and denying the same as to 1.253517 mills. The judgment of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Oklahoma News Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- In Re BlissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- In Re Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Board Ed. of Guthrie v. Excise Board of Logan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- City of Ardmore v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Protest of BledsoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- St. Louis-S. F. R. v. Choctaw County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Berryman v. BonaparteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.