Legal Opinion
Hines v. Dalton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 12, 1923No. 11424PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
As plaintiffs below, plaintiffs in error brought this action to recover certain taxes which had been paid under protest, and from judgment for defendant, prosecutes this appeal.
The controversy arose out of conflicting interpretations of section 6, ch. 226, Sess. Laws 1917 (section 969-9, Comp. Stats. 1921),' the portion of which pertaining to this controversy reads: •
“Section 6. When the excise board shall have ascertained the total assessed valuation of the property taxed ad valorem in the county- and in each municipal subdivision thereof, and shall have computed the total of the several…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McGannon, Admx. v. State Ex Rel. TrappSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Ledegar v. BockovenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Town of Grove v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Going v. Carter Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Oklahoma News Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- In Re MonsellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Adjustment Realty Co. v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Branch v. Oklahoma County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.