Legal Opinion
Threadgill v. Peterson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 18, 1923No. 14169PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBranson, J.
The appeal in this case is prosecuted by C. M. Threadgill, Tom Mitch-am, Isaac Vogel, W. A. Hinkle, and numerous taxpayers of the city of Coalgate, Coal county, Okla. The necessity for their appeal grows out of this state of facts: On the 31st' day of August, 1921, the board of education of the city of Coalgate, Qkla., made and executed a contract with one John Peterson to repair the high school building of said city, or father the ,high school building of independent school district No. 1, which embraces the city of Coalgate, for which the said John Peterson was to 'receive the sum of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Kellogg v. School District No. 10 Comanche Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Bowles v. Neely, MayorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Ter. Bd. of Ed. v. Ter. Okla. Ex Rel. Taylor, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- Ashton v. Board of Com'rs of Murray Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by34 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Faught v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- In Re Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.