Legal Opinion

Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Becks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1996No. COA94-1369PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

In this action for declaratory judgment regarding UIM coverage, defendants primarily assign error to the trial court’s denial of their motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We find defendants’ arguments unpersuasive.

Pertinent facts and procedural information are as follows: On 16 December 1989 in Volusia County, Florida, Kathleen E. Lucas (Mrs. Lucas) and James G. Lucas, Sr. (Mr. Lucas), were fatally injured in an automobile collision while passengers in a 1966 Oldsmobile owned by Mr. Lucas. The vehicle was operated by the Lucas’ son, defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MabeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Proctor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Hendrickson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Heatherly v. Industrial Health CouncilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Haight v. Travelers/Aetna Property Casualty Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. James v. Integon National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Stegenga v. BurneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Sawyers v. Farm Bureau InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API